avad: (Default)
[personal profile] avad
thank you & for this article. I am trying to understand all going on...spent much of yesterday researching and reading up...so complex...I have no clear opinion yet...but am listening and trying to See.

September 30, 2007
Karma Power
What Makes a Monk Mad


By SETH MYDANS
BANGKOK

AS they marched through the streets of Myanmar’s cities last week leading the biggest antigovernment protests in two decades, some barefoot monks held their begging bowls before them. But instead of asking for their daily donations of food, they held the bowls upside down, the black lacquer surfaces reflecting the light.

It was a shocking image in the devoutly Buddhist nation. The monks were refusing to receive alms from the military rulers and their families — effectively excommunicating them from the religion that is at the core of Burmese culture.

That gesture is a key to understanding the power of the rebellion that shook Myanmar last week.

The country — the former Burma — has roughly as many monks as soldiers. The military rules by force, but the monks retain ultimate moral authority. The lowliest soldier depends on them for spiritual approval, and even the highest generals have felt a need to honor the clerical establishment. They claim to rule in its name.

Begging is a ritual that expresses a profound bond between the ordinary Buddhist and the monk. “The people are feeding the monks and the monks are helping the people make merit,” said Josef Silverstein, an expert on Myanmar at Rutgers University. “When you refuse to accept, you have broken the bond that has tied them for centuries together.”

Instead, the monks drew on a different and more fundamental bond with Myanmar’s population, leading huge demonstrations after the government tried to repress protests that began a month ago over a rise in fuel prices.

By last week, the country’s two largest and most established institutions were confronting each other, the monkhood and the military, both about 400,000 strong, both made up of young men, mostly from the poorer classes, who could well be brothers. Rejected by both its spiritual and popular bases, the junta that has ruled for 19 years had little to fall back on but force.

It unleashed its troops to shoot, beat, arrest and humiliate the men in brick-red robes, definitively alienating itself from the clergy whose support gives it legitimacy. Soldiers surrounded monasteries, preventing monks from leading further demonstrations — or from making their morning rounds to collect the alms that feed them.

In Myanmar and other Buddhist nations, many join the monkhood as a lifelong vocation, but many other young men become monks for shorter periods, ranging from a few months to a few years. These young monks remain closer to the lives and concerns of the people whose alms they receive.

Burmese monks have taken part in protests in the past, against British colonial rule and against a half-century of rule by military dictatorship. The most notable recent occasion was in 1990.

Their militant resistance to the British produced the most prominent political martyr of Burmese Buddhism, U Wisara, who died in prison in 1929 after a 166-day hunger strike.

His statue stands near the tall, golden Shwedagon Pagoda, the country’s holiest shrine, which was a rallying point for the recent demonstrations and the scene of the first violence against the monks last week.

That attack came as a shock to people who said the military would not turn violently against the monks, and it had the predictable effect of arousing the fury of a devout population.

But monks have not always been in the political front lines. It was students, for example, who led the mass demonstrations of 1988 that brought the current junta to power in a military massacre.

The monks’ power comes instead from their role in bestowing legitimacy on the rulers.

“Legitimacy in Burma is not about regime performance, it’s not about human rights like the West,” said Ingrid Jordt, a professor of anthropology at the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee and an expert on Burmese Buddhism. “It is something that comes from the potency and karma bestowed by the monks. That’s why the sangha is so important to the government,” she said, referring to the Buddhist hierarchy and the spiritual status that its monks can convey. “They are actually the source of power.”

The junta has gone to great lengths to identify itself with Buddhism. Like their predecessors through the centuries, the generals have been busy building temples, supporting monasteries and carrying out religiously symbolic acts. In 1999, they regilded the spire of the Shwedagon Pagoda, which now glitters with 53 tons of gold and 4,341 diamonds on the crowning orb.

The gilding of the spire was a high-risk ploy for an unpopular regime, an act permitted only to kings and legitimate rulers. When the two-ton, seven-tier finial was added and the spire was complete, the nation held its breath, waiting for the earth to send a signal of disapproval through lightning or thunder or floods, Ms. Jordt said. But nature remained indifferent.

“Aung pyi!” the generals shouted. “We won!”

But their grip on power has never been secure. They have ruled through a security service that keeps order through intimidation. They have arrested thousands of political prisoners and have held the pro-democracy leader, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, under house arrest for 12 of the last 18 years.

In that context, the huge street demonstrations were an act of courage and catharsis.

They started tentatively on Aug. 19 after a fuel price increase raised the costs of transportation and basic goods. Veterans of the student demonstrations of 1988 staged small protests, but most were quickly arrested or driven into hiding. The unrest was fading when security officers beat monks and fired shots into the air during a confrontation in the city of Pakokku on Sept. 5.

That became a spark that grew into a broad-based challenge to the government, culminating last week in the breach between those who hold moral authority and those who have the guns.

“This was not an accidental uprising,” said Zin Linn, a former editor and political prisoner who is now information minister for the National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma, an exile opposition group based in Washington. The transition in leadership in the protests — from militant former students to activist monks — was well planned, he said, through secret meetings among young men sharing similar grievances and aspirations for their country. For the most part, it was not the elders who backed the protests. Over the years, the junta has worked to co-opt the Buddhist hierarchy, placing chosen men in key positions just as they have done in every other institution, angering and alienating the younger monks.

After the military clampdown on the monasteries last week, the streets of Yangon were mostly empty of monks. But their gesture of rejection of the junta, and the junta’s violent response, had changed the dynamics of Burmese society in ways that had only begun to play out.

The junta’s action “shows how desperate they are,” Ms. Jordt said. “It shows that they are willing to do anything at this point in terms of violence. Once you’ve thrown your lot in against the monks, I think it will be impossible for the regime to go back to normal daily legitimacy.”


Copyright 2007 The New York Times Company
Privacy Policy

Monk power only goes so far

Date: 2007-10-08 07:02 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
From the Kenster:
The junta’s action “shows how desperate they are,” Ms. Jordt said. “It shows that they are willing to do anything at this point in terms of violence. Once you’ve thrown your lot in against the monks, I think it will be impossible for the regime to go back to normal daily legitimacy.”

There's a danger to that sort of thinking, just as there's a danger in thinking a lawsuit against Unocal will, in the end, accomplish anything for the people of Burma. The generals crushed the monks and the opposition and, as usual, the best the international community could muster was one representative to voice stern condemnation. Meanwhile entire villages are missing as are monks by the thousands. A regime that shows such callous disregard for "tradition" usually gets its point across clearly. "Look what we did to the monks. You think we care about your protests?" Protests rarely work ... and then only if the protestors are up against a weakened regime or the protests contain such magnitudes that the regime fears a wholesale breakdown of society. (I don't know that the U.K. or the U.S. were impressed by Gandhi's or MLK's peaceful protests as much as the sight of so MANY people obviously riled up and the fact that those multitudes could get tired of the peaceful part of protesting.)

And Burma knows very well it has nothing to worry about from the U.N., which hasn't stopped a conflict since ... well, it's never done so.

The danger here is that the rest of the world says, "Oh, look at those brave monks" and "Well, that showed them!" and then feeling like something has been accomplished. At the end of the day, the military regime is still in place. The danger is thinking something is actually accomplished by getting a few million out of Unocal. Yes, the company should be sued and it should pay. But the fact is, it does nothing for the people in Burma. Just as all these t-shirts and awareness-raising campaigns do nothing for Darfur -- nothing except give people in the West a warm glow of smug self-satisfaction. At this point, however, everyone is AWARE of Darfur. Awareness isn't the issue. The issue is leaving people defenseless and trying not to upset the Chinese and other African nations.

The ugliest reality is that dropping in crates of AK-47s into Darfur refugee camps and teaching them how to use them would be the quickest way to stop the one-sided carnage. And some Buddhist monks feel the same way. Do a google search and you'll see that Buddhist monks/teachers in isolated parts of Thailand have started arming themselves with guns to shoot/kill Islamic militants who terrorize such outposts. You know things are pretty bad when the Buddhist monks are like, "Screw this. I'm getting a gun."

In terms of Burma, nothing will be done unless China decides that something should be done. And considering that country's sterling human rights record ... Though if things get ugly enough to where it might look like a civil war or sectarian strife will break out, China will march in and clamp down if only to keep its access to the sea free from strife and interference.

Re: Monk power only goes so far

Date: 2007-10-13 03:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] avad.livejournal.com
"The ugliest reality is that dropping in crates of AK-47s into Darfur refugee camps and teaching them how to use them would be the quickest way to stop the one-sided carnage."

True. And turn it into a nice old two-sided carnage. woopee. who 'wins' again?
while we're at it let's have the youngest kids turn against eachother and form micro-gangs for 'practice'. that'll stop the violence.

And truthfully I personally haven't seen any smug self-satisfaction in anyone about 'actions' for darfur or burma...or maybe that it would pale in comparison to the much more prevalent frustration, helplessness and desperation to voice the awareness and condemnation of injustice. As you may notice I haven't voiced any opinions or calls to action...mainly because of the complexity of the situation and that I do not see a clear helpful action (which saddens me greatly). BUT looking at the bigger picture, I tend to see the protests and shows of solidarity not to be 'dangerous because of ineffectiveness' but rather hopeful practice and demonstration for the actions that Can be taken by large groups of people to change very changeable circumstances in the world. Every movement I see that prioritizes a concern and a willingness to try to Do something for the suffering of others over the more prevalent cycling of daily petty microdramas or obsessions with luxury consumption seem very hopeful to me here in the west.

The Unocal article/issue is brought up merely to show more of the tangled web of cause and effect. Once again we are shown how greed turns a blind eye to exploitation and even extreme human rights abuses. who in this murky web is 'to blame'? It's also cause to stop and think about this in our own lives...what do we all deliberately overlook for want of financial progress and convenience?

February 2017

S M T W T F S
   123 4
5 67891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728    

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 6th, 2025 09:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios