avad: (Default)
avad ([personal profile] avad) wrote2005-01-23 11:31 am

More on Memory Palaces

I bring up Memory Palaces not to necessarily encourage a return to the ancient art in its same form.
The Art of Memory and the Method of Loci (back in the days) was really quite an immense visualization trick...and a feat I think that few people today would consciously use. What I'm very excited about is the probability that we're entering a new phase in the internet and a new form of memory retention (which traces back to this concept of memory palaces) will become second nature to the masses:


What we're seeing happen here...is that 'memory palaces' are, can and will be made in 3d graphic interface. You don't as much need to 'hold' the whole building in your mind...as you BUILD the building and return to it over and over.
Think of computer games....the addictive warring kind even...those who play them regularly come to KNOW all the aspects of the various environments...they know that over 'here' are power-point giving thingies...and that at this point some flying bad guys will come out of that door to the right..and they have to jump to that stone and click on that button and whatever whatever to keep going... They learn how to move from room to room, landscape to landscape, level to level of the game, just by playing it...by tracing the steps and gathering a sort of 'memory-skill'.
Now what I'm terribly excited about and see happening...is a gradual reordering of the internet in just this way. Our ways of storing information for retrieval are just not cutting it anymore. I have tons of information stored in 'files' but the accessibility is diminishing with each new folder.

Or take for a good example LJ itself. Our entries are reverse chronological when accessed for the first time by a new visitor or even ourselves. A different sort of spatial organization is needed for me to be able to offer all entries relating to a certain topic etc. And that's what the 'memories' button is supposed to be for ...but I think we all know it is lacking....because it's still much too linear...too scroll-based...
Now try to imagine LJ in a more spatial 3d format...where instead of our user intro page...you land at a house or environment of the user's design...with information embedded (clickable) within objects in a more intuitive way...and think of all the connectivity possible...the portals..:)And by returning to this place over and over we naturally learn/remember where to find the information. And multiple searching tools can be utilized as well...
ok, so the designing of 'home-pages' (see the term, eh?) becomes more and more immersive. ...

"A hypertext with its clickable icons and images is like a memory palace and each link is a locus .When you click, the idea stored there appears as a new document.The only difference is that you don't have to memorize the structure . From this point of view hypertext is much more like the Camillo Theatre: a physical space where you learn by walking. Virtual Reality is essentially a 3D hypertext.You now navigate not only with the mouse but with all your body:the dream of Camillo becomes true.We can now build a place where you learn only by walking."
-from Giuseppe Zito's page on the Method of Loci.

I think that secondlife.com/islands is a perfect experimental platform for us..in that we can explore the building our own personal 'memory palaces' and connecting them with others in a shareable 3d realm... (ha, now you see my 'Connecting Islands' artwork tell its lil secret story/prophecy..;)

And just like in LJ, aspects of your memory palace can remain public, 'private' or 'friends only' as you choose.
So much to think about here.
I think I want to solicit the help of a 3d builder or architecture student to speed up my process in this direction. So that I might offer you all specific visual examples sooner rather than later....:)

[identity profile] babayada.livejournal.com 2005-01-25 02:40 am (UTC)(link)
Well, as far as microsoft goes, the last I saw was that they saw the way people use files is much like the way people use a database, so they wanted to incorporate database type functionality into their file system.

This way information is taken and presented to the user much like data from a database is taken and presented. The emphasis is on sorting information in a way that makes sense to the user rather than to the operating system.

Apple is doing the same thing but taking a different approach. Microsoft's file system is supposedly clumsy and slow. Apple decided to keep the file system pretty much the way it is but to build upon their already robust search technology.

In their upcoming OS you can build "folders" out of a variety of search criteria. You'll no longer have to drag and drop into folders. You just create a folder with a certain set of search criteria and there you are, your files will automatically appear in it.

This may ultimately free the operating system to store files in a way that makes sense to itself (and keep this transparent to the user) while the user can have files sorted the way he or she deems fit.

[identity profile] avad.livejournal.com 2005-01-25 12:34 pm (UTC)(link)
sounds good to me....
heh kindof works with the painting I'm working on these days which will probably be called
'Self-Assembling Memory Palace' which has shards of spaces and bits coalescing (ok, the movement is in my mind) into place....assembling like slow action snowflakes...!
mmmmmm

[identity profile] babayada.livejournal.com 2005-01-25 08:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Ever read Edward de Bono?

He writes about the mind being an environment in which information self-organizes.